[VIEWED 14509
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
Please log in to subscribe to 's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 3:25
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
If san does not remove NAS album, I am also going to search thousands of semi pornograhic pictures in google and post all of them in ramjham.
|
|
|
|
nepalean
Please log in to subscribe to nepalean's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 4:57
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
A STICH IN TIME SAVES NINE!
|
|
|
Nas
Please log in to subscribe to Nas's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 5:04
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
he should not undermine peoples family, cultural or religious values, etc. Some people viewing the website with family or friends may not feel that comfortable with his album - Bhunte Giving up my rights of expression in Ramjham (without violating its term) for the sake of so called "family,cultural or religious values" is same as saying one should give up Democracy and preserve Monarchy for the sake of King who is revered as the living incarnation of Lord Vishnu.
|
|
|
freek
Please log in to subscribe to freek's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 5:05
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
in nepali there is saying खाऔ कान्छा बाउ को अनुहार न खाऔ दिन भरि को सिकार same thing happening to san bro ,,, but who cares i like NAS posting atleast i dont have to go aroung and look ,,, Nas doing job for me ehehe but san bro i dont thing there ar onmli 99 user in in sajha ,, as u said If 50 or over people don't even want to see those kind of photos in ramjham, then I am sure there will be more who don't want to see it on sajha homepage u ald started the poll y not to wait for the result huh NAS bro keep posting as much as u can b4 NAs being removed from RAMJHAM thumbs upp ehehe at least creative work ,,, good research ;) ;)
|
|
|
bibas100
Please log in to subscribe to bibas100's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 5:34
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Here is the suggestion for San, If you want Sajha to be a commercial site, allow people to post nude, semi-nude pictures. After all, it is your private site. On the contrary, if you want this to be a decent forum for discussion, I think it is wise to refrain from such pictures directly being promoted from the main page. Ramjham is promoted from the main page right now even though the pictures are off the line. Sometimes it is not the best idea to go by the majority decisions. If all of your kids want to watch porn at home, or may be bring a white girl from the bar, would you permit them? I know the example is quite off the hook but still it serves the purpose-majority decisions aren't always advisable. So, San!!!! If you dare, make a decision of your own and justify your actions. Sajha is by far the most popular discussion forum and it will continue to be so no matter what few members feel about it...
|
|
|
Murkha123
Please log in to subscribe to Murkha123's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 6:20
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yeah, I will go with One Wise Man than thousands of idiots (Maoists' Supporters of sajha are included in this category)..
|
|
|
KnightCrawler
Please log in to subscribe to KnightCrawler's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 7:24
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Is NAS and SAN the same person???? Just curious...If you reverse SAN, you get NAS....I hope its just a mere co-incidence....I have nothing for or against the photo postings though....
|
|
|
AznshawtY
Please log in to subscribe to AznshawtY's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 7:27
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
geez after all these threads and stuff, you cant figure out if they are the same or different people, omg, SAN is an administrator of sajha and NAS is a user like us :)
|
|
|
KnightCrawler
Please log in to subscribe to KnightCrawler's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 7:33
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Thanks AZN...I thought maybe SAN uses another alias, ironically just the reverse of SAN, i.e NAS......It must be friday......Lemme get in the mood for a huge College Football action tomorrow !
|
|
|
zany_giovanni
Please log in to subscribe to zany_giovanni's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:18
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Just a shout out to Nas for doing a good job. It's nice to see pics that are pleasing to the eyes. I see no problems with them. Pokheri, feel free to post your pics too as long as they are not nude. I mean feel free to post pics of beautiful women. God forbid, but I don't want to see your nude pics. I might go blind LOL.
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I voted Yes on the question. Not that my vote matters because San dai has already made up his mind, and I'd say rightly so. So I tought I'd cast a protest vote to make a statement about content on Sajha. Truth be told, I am quite amused at all the attention this issue has gotten. I am no big fan of seeing women in bikinis but I'd argue the bikini is not the real problem on Sajha. How about all the vitriolic crap related to politics and caste that we have been subjected to on the front pages of Sajha? I doubt many people would want to see a thong when they open up Sajha but nothing, I'd argue, can be as bad as opening up Sajha to find senseless threads that are hateful, derogatory and inflamatary in nature clutterring up the home page every so often I realize content on this site is very user-driven and I accept that as a part of life on Sajha. Sometimes, though, I wish there was more moderation on this site and San dai would delegate some of this responsibility to volunteers if he can't find the time to do it himself. Just a thought, San dai. But in the absense of such moderation, if I have to live with what I think is mostly sub-par content, I'd rather it be about bikinis than about bigotry. Also, Sajha wouldn't be Sajha without controversy and even though I voted the way I did, I am glad we are having a discussion about the subject. Happy friday all!
|
|
|
Shiva_Shakti
Please log in to subscribe to Shiva_Shakti's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:37
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I just wanted to write a famous quote by John Quincy Adams: "Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost."
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:44
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Shiva Shakti - I don't know what you are getting at, but I firmly believe my vote was cast based on the principle that motivates me the most: if we are looking to clean up Sajha, bigotry is where we should start. I have less of a problem with the bikini.
|
|
|
GwachAquarian
Please log in to subscribe to GwachAquarian's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:52
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
La mitra tapai pani aafno tasbir sankalan lai prakasit garnus,,yesma mero pura samarthan cha,,baru samalingi haru ko tasbir chai naparos haii,,,feri bihana bihana sajha herera mero din kharab hola
|
|
|
Murkha123
Please log in to subscribe to Murkha123's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 8:57
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hey NAS, why you are doing copy and paste???????????? That's lousy... if you have photographic talents, show it. Otherwise do not merely copy paste pictures from drains.
|
|
|
HairyPotter
Please log in to subscribe to HairyPotter's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 9:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
What does this guy Nas, think of himself ? Nepali Lary Flint..dude ..you just copy and paste..actually you steal pictures from all around ..
|
|
|
TimroBa
Please log in to subscribe to TimroBa's postings.
Posted on 11-03-06 9:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
लौ अब त पुग्यो है .......
|
|
|
sujanks
Please log in to subscribe to sujanks's postings.
Posted on 11-04-06 1:22
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Mero dui paiso ko bhanai: Anyone can post whatever they want on the open forum. But if the material is not their's then it should be properly quoted and credited the originator. I guess Nas doesn't do that, sometimes even claiming some to be his friends, which i know for sure they are not. I had even left some comments on his photographs about that, but he never accepted any of them.
|
|
|
Hulaki
Please log in to subscribe to Hulaki's postings.
Posted on 11-04-06 2:18
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Sajha's identity in crisis? What is sajha's mission? - serving the diaspora? - earning a buck? - or both? and who calls the shots around here, dudes?
|
|
|
VincentBodega
Please log in to subscribe to VincentBodega's postings.
Posted on 11-04-06 7:09
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hey bit(hes, Please stop whinning. We are not three years old that we can hold people on emotional ransom and hope it work. Who cares what you do and dont worry too much about what Nas does. This molehill is really turning out to be a mountain. Theres a reason God gave us eye lids, if you dont like something you see close the fu(k out of them. You wont see a thing. However, if you are looking at the pics and yet complaining, thats pretty fu(ked up. Nas taking out those pics wont help your cause, may be a psychiatrist will. But who knows. Stop this San and Nas business and get on with your life. I think theres more filth in the threads that you guys started than in those picture themselves.
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 11-04-06 10:11
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LOL! Timro ba. That was hilarious! You are are very good cartoonist because you hit at the core of the matter - the real reason why some people want bikinis banned. To me it pretty clear that people are after Nas because of what he said against the Sai baba - after all those explicit pictures have been out there for quite a while. No one complained up to this point. And now everyone with any grudge against him, jumps on the band wagon and piles up against him. I am not here to defend Nas. There are some valid points raised here and we can debate those and amicably disgaree. What I am amused by, and I am with Vincent Bodega here, is all the whining and moaning. This is classic politics: dicredit the messenger to discredit the message. No one was able to sucessfully fend off his attacks on the Baba and then all of a sudden the pictures become a big issue. Machevallian to the nth degree. Coincidence?
|
|